347-878-3837

Blog

Here are articles on Blog

Leading Through Chaos, part 4: The Leverage Point of Change

Leading Through Chaos, part 4: The Leverage Point of Change

Leading Through Chaos: The Leverage for Change

What came before: In part 1, we saw that chaos is a problem because it makes prediction hard. A barbell strategy helps us make it through. In part 2 we dealt with risk of ruin, and part 3, covered upside opportunity.

I’ve been talking about what you need to work through a time of turbulence. It involves planning (or not-planning) differently. That means actually changing the way you do things.

These mindset shifts are easy enough to do when it’s just you, but if you have a team, it gets way harder.

Narrator: these were not “easy enough to do” when it’s just you.

But there’s a lever. When you’re adapting an organization to new challenges, there’s one place where a small tweak can snowball into large organizational shifts.

The lever requires leadership, and a different emphasis on how you show up as a leader.

But before we can talk leadership, you need to understand the lever. It’s one that you use a dozen times a day…

The Moment of Truth

At my first management job, I was chose to join several company executives in a training with W. Edwards Deming. Deming founded the Total Quality movement which revolutionized Japanese manufacturing, and then American.

Deming taught us how to improve the quality of our work, systemically. We learned sexy, exciting things like cause/effect fishbone diagrams and statistical process control charts.

Our spouses were thrilled by our newfound dinnertime conversation!

Narrator: Their spouses were not thrilled.

When we got back to the office, someone reported that our product was hard to install. I ran to a vice president who had been at the workshop.

“This is the perfect time for us to set up a Deming system with my team! Let’s do it!”

“No,” he said. “There’s no need. What we learned will emerge from our work organically.”

(Ah, yes. The famous “statistical process control charts emerge from our work like Venus emerging from the sea” principle. I can’t even write the sentence without rolling my eyes so hard my glasses fall off.)

What he did was make a decision, the decision not to keep doing what he did. He could have decided to try a statistical process control chart. That decision make the difference. Or in this case, the sameness.

Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference. — Robert Frost

When you make a decision to take one road over another, it can be minor for the first few steps. The other road is still visible. A few more steps, and the other road fades from sight. Pretty soon, you’re somewhere new and different, far from where you would have been.

To weather the storm in a business, the magic is in how they decide

If you want to change behavior, change decisions. It’s possible.

I learned from VICI Partners, a consulting company that has perfected the art of changing companies by changing their decisions.

Their method works. They have a perfect decades-long track record of helping companies change decisions. The proof? Their clients get a minimum profit boost[1] of 30–80% in under a year, whether it’s a $50 million company or a $20 billion company. And they charge based on results, so they’re highly motivated to do what works.

I like that! When I hear about results like that, I want to learn everything I can. Fortunately, the managing partner is a lifelong friend, and he put up with me asking him to step me through their process a piece at a time.

(I was so impressed that I’ve become a finder for them, so if you’d like an introduction, please request it through me.)

Reaching Decision Nirvana

Let’s explore their broadest framework—how long-term successful companies organize the decisions that lead to enduring success.

VICI’s decision-making framework looks at two dimensions of a company: (1) are decisions made from data or politics, and (2) can many people make decisions or is decision-making centralized.

The “Nirvana Zone” produces the outstanding results: data-based decisions, with many people free to make decisions. That’s where you want to be in times of turmoil.

That’s where we’ll focus. (You can read about the whole decision-making framework here.)

Amazon embodies the Nirvana Zone. Jeff Bezos encouraged many decision-makers to try things, with crystal-clear guidance to do what’s best for the customer. Amazon Prime and AWS Cloud Services were two of the small experiments. AWS now powers 40% of the Internet, and Amazon Prime is now a key element in Amazon’s profit-making strategy.

In short, you want NO POLITICS and MANY PEOPLE who can decide (and they need to be educated in order to decide).

VICI

The messages you need to give your decision-makers.

Now let’s apply this to what we’ve learned so far. You need to operate in a time when we can’t predict well: cover your downside and find unpredictable upside opportunity while using “affordable loss” so you can still sleep at night.

The challenge: aligning the decisions-making in your firm.

First, do a Nirvana Zone check. Who can make decisions in the firm? Do they base decisions on data, or politics, opinion, and whimsy?

If you’re not data-based with distributed decision-making, your first task is to start creating that culture. (Culture change is leadership stuff. That’s coming in the next installment.)

You’ll collect data that depends on your specific business. But among the data you want:

  • What (possibly new) problems are customers struggling with?
  • What are competitors doing?
  • Which sectors are doing well?
  • Which are faltering?

You’ll want many people who can make decisions from the data. You want them running experiments within your affordable less, to find and grab opportunity when they see it. Expect most to fail at finding the next great business opportunity, but done right, they should succeed at learning, which tilts the in your favor.

The upside opportunity comes from being a learning machine, while surviving long enough to find the path to long-term survival.

We’ve been talking systems and budgets. But people make up your company. Change like this needs more than management. It needs leadership.

… it’s leadership all the way down

Now that we know what we need to do, and how we need to be organized to do it, the final installment of Leading Through Chaos, will tackle what you as a leader—official or otherwise—need to do to put it into practice.

In the next and final installment, we’ll confront head-on the biggest mistake that many business leaders make and what you need to do to navigate through…

P.S. If you’re interested in learning more about organizational decision-making, leadership, VICI, or culture change, just drop me a line.


  1. Technically, operating earnings, but let’s not split hairs. ↩︎

Leading Through Chaos, part 4: The Leverage Point of Change

Leading Through Chaos, part 3: Seizing Opportunity!

In part 1 we covered the need for predictability. We took Nassim Nicholas Taleb’s advice in part 2 to cover our worst-case scenarios.

Reader Shari Aaron asked: My business faces short-term disruption. Client budget approvals are very slow, due to so much uncertainty. How do you balance the need to keep your business healthy, when you believe it will come back once we have more clear direction on economics/tariffs, etc.?

We’ve already seen that priority #1 is Don’t Die! But don’t go into survival mode, just yet. Because even in survival mode, you need to keep the tools to rebuild.

You need to grab any upside that comes with turbulence. You can’t use prediction, remember. The rules are changing too fast.

I’ve personally never been good at ambiguity. My mind is orderly. It runs on plans. No plan? No problem. I’ll make a plan to create a plan. Then I’ll follow that. To my mind, it’s plans all the way down.

But when faced with things that can’t be planned, I freeze like a deer in headlights. Cold headlights. Subzero headlights. With a freeze ray. I really freeze.

I’ve always wanted to be able to plan for the unplannable. And after decades of searching, I learned there’s a way.

We have role models right in front of us who operate where the rules are unknown. Where opportunity is all around, and the skill shifts from predicting the future to shaping the future.

As it turns out …

Entrepreneurs Live in Uncertainty

It’s entrepreneurs! They do what we need! When they invent new products or open new markets, they don’t know how it will turn out. The successful ones limit their downside while grabbing opportunity. The very barbell we want!

Even better, we know how to think to do this.

Babson College has been the world’s #1 school in entrepreneurship since 1994. I worked with the President during their strategy redesign, and there learned about Entrepreneurial Thought and Action.

It start with Professor Saras Sarasvathy at the Darden School of Business. She found serial entrepreneurs with multiple successes. All had invented new products and markets. Prediction and planning were impossible.

Successful entrepreneurs limit their downside while grabbing opportunity

She gave them challenges and had them describe their approach to overcoming them. Successful entrepreneurs all used the same mindset. A mindset that captures good luck, while protecting against losses.

She called it “Effectuation,” an easy-to-remember, evocative name that instantly conveys deep meaning. Jk.

For me, it was love at first read (the concept, anyway. The research itself makes a great insomnia cure). It gave a framework! Not as good as a plan, but a way forward. A way to take action when faced with my dread nemesis, The Unknowable.

Acting Under Uncertainty: The Basics of Effectuation

We usually make decisions based on plans. Or the way we think the future will unfold. Effectuation complements that approach.

Where we can’t plan, we can effectuate. When plans work again, we reach for our beloved GANTT chart.

“Effectuation” is for whenever there isn’t a firm roadmap: starting a company, dating, writing a theatrical piece, launching a product, building a gigantic Burning Man art installation, learning a skill, or anywhere else you can think of.

Learn the Effectuation principles and apply them as needed:

Pilot in Plane. Don’t think about the future as something you predict; think of the it as something you shape. You’re not a passenger in the plane, you’re the pilot. You can change where it’s going by taking action. As business scholar Peter Drucker often said, “The best way to predict the future is to create it.”.

Bird in Hand. Textbook business development classes tell us how to make the future happen:

  1. Set an end goal
  2. Build a plan to reach that goal
  3. Raise the money from investors to execute that plan.

But knowing a goal and plan requires prediction. Instead, try doing whatever you can with what you have on hand—from money to hard assets to relationships.

Identify how to invest the fewest resources to get the most learning to direct you towards the right course of action. Invest those. Then use what you learn to decide on another learning cycle or a switch into planning mode.

Crazy quilt. In uncertain times, listen to people who have skin in the game. Everyone has advice, even though they can’t predict any better than you can. Hold their advice lightly … unless they put skin in the game. If they’re committed enough to their ideas to put down money, time, or sacrifice, they’re worth taking seriously.

That doesn’t just mean doing what they say. It’s adding another relationship, another patch, to your quilt of committed stakeholders. The more people have skin in the game, the more you’ll support each other. You’ll all be motivated to roll up your sleeves, get creative, and make the business work together.

Affordable loss. To sleep well at night, never invest more than you can afford to lose. Once again, this addresses the “Don’t die!” barbell.

Every so often, review what you can afford to lose and still sleep at night. How much money? How much reputation? How much time? Then ask, “given what I can afford to lose, what can I do to make as much progress as far as possible?”

Combined with Bird-in-Hand, Affordable loss is how you choose a path forward that keeps you sane while keeping you solvent.

Lemonade. When life gives you lemons, make lemonade. When things don’t go the way you want, always be asking how to turn the new circumstances into advantage.

This is where you find the other half of your barbell, upside! When you are nimble—because you have limited your downside to your affordable loss—you can experiment when opportunity or brilliant ideas come your way.

Remember, everyone else is also without a roadmap and disoriented. So when you see a $100 bill on the sidewalk, grab it! Everyone else might be missing it because they’re too busy trying to figure out why their plans aren’t working.


Effectuation gives you a way to take short steps (the size of your affordable loss), with committed allies (crazy quilt), to direct your resources (pilot in plane, bird in the hand) towards seizing opportunity (lemonade), all while sleeping well at night (affordable loss).

Two colleagues and I trained in Effectuation. We then founded a company and ran it for a year and a half explicitly using effectuation. At its peak, we had a team of 14 people, an alpha-level product, and a total capitalization of less than $5,000.

What we know so far:

If you’re changing how you plan, how you prioritize, and turning planning into learning cycles, you need to change the way you make decisions.

Next time, we’ll look at how your company can make high-quality decisions to go down possibly new, lemonade-covered paths.

Leading Through Chaos, part 4: The Leverage Point of Change

Leading Through Chaos part 2: Don’t Die! (aka Barbells and Risk of Ruin)

I have long planned to buy a new computer in 2026. My current desktop is nearing its end of life, but it still limps along. I’d rather not invest right now; cash is tight, tariffs are high, and my portfolio is down. But supply chain disruptions might mean that prices jump later this year. 

What do I do? 

Do I stick to my original plan? Do I change my priorities and buy now? Do I sit tight and not spend money until I know what’s coming? 

In part 1 of this series, I suggested that Nassim Nicholas Taleb’s “barbell” approach to risk makes sense here. 

As Anti-Fragile made clear, our top priority is protecting against risks that could wipe us out. 

Find What’s Likely to go Wrong (80/20 rule)

We can’t predict business-as-usual, but we can probably predict business as unusual

We humans focus on best-case and worst-case scenarios. Right now, the best case is unclear, but the worst case probably isn’t. We often know where things are unstable.

We just need to know which major disasters could reasonably come our way. An asteroid strike? Probably not worth our attention. But a drop in order volume, or a rise in tariffs probably is.

The full risk assessments and risk management efforts I’ve done with clients have often taken one or more days, to be thorough. But things are changing too fast to reconsider everything each time there’s a shift.

Instead, focus your attention and your risk management efforts first and foremost on the things that are easy to identify: the things that could tank you and tank you fast. 

Burning Man’s Risk Management Pays Off

Burning Man is a city that exists for one week each year. It’s built out of experiential art in the Black Rock Desert in Nevada. Most years, it’s hot and dry. But in 2023, it rained. As it happens, the playa dust turns a clay tarpit when wet. It became impossible for people to get it or out. Mud would collect on car wheels and mire the wheels in the ground.

The organizers did their risk management. They had considered this possibility and the Burning Man Organization handled ‘mudpocalypse’ just fine.

A picture of a fantastical Burning Man structure in a dry desert, juxtaposed with a picture of a soggy hippy trudging through the mud after a rainstorm.

Plan for many possible downsides. Identify the government policies, external signals, and actions others could take that could lead to disaster for you. 

For Burning Man, it was rain. For your business, it could be clients leaving you for political reasons.

For each scenario, brainstorm:

  1. How to reduce chances of that happening
  2. How to recover if it does happen, and
  3. How you’ll know that scenario is becoming more likely.

Don’t Panic!

I once considered buying a house as an investment. It needed a lot of repairs. About a hundred thousand dollars’ worth. YIKES!

Here was my thinking:

Pros 15 years of slightly better-than-breakeven expenses and rent. Then it becomes a steady income stream. If rents rise with inflation, it could fund part of my retirement.

Cons Guaranteed need to cover mortgage and taxes even if it’s not rented. It puts me in debt for a six figure amount. I’ve never managed contractors. Cost overruns could bankrupt me.

RUN AWAY!

The Cons scared the pants off me. I declined.

After looking up the property’s last assessed value, letting this deal go definitely ranks as one of the five worst decisions of my life.

What I should have done: tease apart different scenarios and consider them individually.

Avoid Risk of Ruin … But Be Smart!

The problem is that I was treating the Cons as if they were guaranteed. And I was treating the upside as if it was highly uncertain. 

In reality, the opposite was more realistic. The upside was near certain, and the downside was only somewhat likely. 

Furthermore, there were many ways to limit the downside losses:

  • Property Damage. Take out insurance.
  • Shoddy repairs. Pay more for a highly reliable contractor. (“More” yes, but in the grand scheme of things, not that much more.)
  • Slow contractors. Structure the renovation to make payments contingent on completion.
  • Too-large an amount to risk. Bring in an experienced real estate investor as a minority (or even majority) partner on the deal.
  • Costs spiral out of control. (The “nuclear option”) Resell the building at below market, a modest loss, if expenses were too great.

When it comes to my new computer, the major downside scenarios are (1) wait and have my current computer fail or become obsolete completely, forcing me to buy at a much higher price if costs rise substantially (2) buy now and having a better model come out later and (3) buy now when the money could be used for other things.

When I listed the downsides individually, it’s pretty clear that the downside of waiting is an interruption to my business and a possible bigger purchase price. The downside of buying now is entirely opportunity cost.

Since I don’t have any opportunities on the table that would be hurt by the purchase, I placed the order while I was writing this essay.

(Yup. I really use risk analysis, myself!)

But this is only one part of the equation, limiting the existential risk. You still need to increase your chances of finding the upside in the chaos. We’ll tackle finding the upside in the next newsletter. 

Leading Through Chaos, part 4: The Leverage Point of Change

Leading Through Chaos, part 1: What’s the Root Problem?

The world is pretty crazy right now, and it’s hard to know what to do. About anything. But even wait-and-see is doing something.

Or maybe, we can step up as leaders. Business leaders. And since everything is in flux, not just business, we can also be family leaders. Friend and community leaders.

Leading or not, we need a way to deal with the chaos.

The first step is understanding why chaos is even a problem.

America has decided to step down as a world power. Given our central role in the world’s economy, America shifts, and so does everyone else. Stock markets are dropping. Currencies are fluctuating. We’re talking decades of ripple effects. And that’s just the economy.

We don’t know what the world order will look like five years from now. We don’t know what our lives will look like. But different. Almost certainly, different.

Personally, I’m plenty scared. My whole life has been based on stories about the future:

  • There’s always opportunity available if you decide to grab it.
  • I have control over my future.
  • My later years will be spent with family and friends.
  • Physical health and fitness is possible, if you just put in the work.
  • The world will generally get better over time, leading to more opportunity, health, prosperity, and safety.

In short, I’ve assumed that everything needed for a vital, fulfilling life is available.

Do Lunch or Be Lunch

But there’s the rub. When those assumptions are up-ended, everything else seems in doubt.

  • Will there be opportunity, two years from now? As I write this, GDP forecasts have dropped from +3% to 0% in the last six weeks.

  • Will there be health care, sanitation, food standards, and public health that can help support me in my old age? It’s looking unlikely.

  • Will my country even be conducive to community, mutual support, happiness and love?

We want to know these things so we can plan for them.

My Harvard Business School professor Howard Stevenson changed my thinking more than anyone else. He has a knack for reframing life situations in powerful ways.

In his book Do Lunch or Be Lunch, he suggests that the fundamental human drive isn’t survival, it’s predictability. Predictability is what helps us survive.

We don’t want to Be Lunch; we don’t want to be the hapless victim of the Saber Tooth Tiger.

We want to Do Lunch. We want to be the ones in control. We want to build, plan, and do so we can be the diners, not the meal.

Building and planning means knowing the future. Or at least knowing what the future is likely to be. That’s why science is great. Science tells us how the world works.

When we combine “how the world works” with “what we see, feel, and hear” (also known as data), we can predict future:

There’s a huge tree outside my window. The branches are near the house (observation). Close branches + wind = broken windows (how the world works). Knowing that, I can ask an arborist to trim the tree.

Note to self: Call the arborist. That tree’s getting a little too close.

It’s far from perfect, but it works better than anything else humans have tried.

Risk? Defuse it!

When you “Do Lunch,” that’s risk management. We do it everywhere.

Financial professionals are always looking for ways to get high returns with downside protection—that’s risk management.

Ever hear of a “hedge fund?” They started as funds designed to help investors “hedge their bets” against downturns in other investments.

Households save for a rainy day. Or for college, just in case our kids don’t get a full scholarship (does anywhere even give full scholarships).

We buy life insurance policies for our families, in case we get eaten by a Saber Tooth tiger.

We audition for Broadway, and also learn a marketable skill, just in case we don’t get selected as Elder Price in Book of Mormon. (h/t to my friend Pete, who despite being a “triple threat” singer, dancer, actor, also learned to code.)

We don’t like chaos because it screws up our ability to predict—and thus control—the future.

Change, even good change, can be bad

The ultimate in predictability would be if we could freeze everything the way it is. I watched the 2023 movie Barbie last night.

In it, the character Gloria (delightfully portrayed by America Ferrera) tells Barbie, “That’s life. It’s all change.” (Barbie’s response? “That’s terrifying—I don’t want that!”)

Nevertheless, the world changes. We can adapt to slow change. It gives us time to learn the new rules. Then we make new predictions and new plans.

Fast change is another matter. Too fast and our systems start breaking down without giving us time to learn the new rules.

The fundamental human drive is predictability. — Howard Stevenson (paraphrased)

When change is too fast, we stop investing for the future. Consider college: Who wants to spend four years and thousands to learn advanced skills that might be obsolete in ten years? When college is a path to success, it’s a no-brainer. When the job market changes so fast that college is a six-figure gamble? Not so much.

We can’t plan long-term during unpredictability, so we have to settle for short-term tactics. But that’s dangerous. Because short-term gains often come at the expense of long-term health.

The way to deal with chaos is to find predictability wherever you can.

Start from your bedrock

Find what you can predict and plan for it. Then find other ways to deal with the unpredictable.

If your supply chain is breaking down, or your retirement savings drops by 30%, use risk management for some short-term options. Then learn some new ways to think about strategy under uncertainty. We’ll cover my favorite later in this series.

In the book Anti-Fragile, Nassim Nicholas Taleb lays out a proposal for how we manage risk. It’s a barbell strategy. We deal with the extreme downsides and the extreme upsides.

First and foremost, we arrange our lives to protect against the worst-case scenarios. The risk of ruin. Things there’s no coming back from.

My own retirement strategy started with an investment account that I couldn’t touch until age 59 1/2. It invested in low-risk, long-term, dependably predictable investments. If nothing else worked, it’s protction against ruin.

The second part of Taleb’s strategy is the other end of the barbell: the extreme upsides. Always make sure you have some exposure to the best possible cases.

We’ll cover everything in the next few newsletters — protection from ruin, managing to find upsides through turmoil, and where to lean in as a leader.

But let’s start at the beginning. In the next segment, we’ll look at how to protect yourself against risk of ruin.

Want to tank your profit margin? Just do a successful merger!

A fable of Maximus Grandeur, CEO of Gaping Maw Co[1].

Think you understand “synergies”? Think again. Most people don’t. Synergies can happen. The boost revenues and profits, but tank profit margin. In fact, math often guarantees it. Here’s an example.

In the Beginning

Consider two standalone companies. Milk Co and Ice Cream Co.

  • Milk Co makes $9 million profit on revenues of $300 million. That’s 3% profit.
  • Ice Cream Co makes $2.5 million on $50 million. That’s 5% profit.
  • Gaping Maw Co is a large food company that makes $80 million on $1 billion in revenues. That’s 8% profit margin.

Enter Maximus Grandeur, Gaping Maw Co’s new CEO. He’s been feeling inadequate in the bedroom, so in a misplaced attempt to shore up his self-esteem and fool himself into believing that he has agency in life, he buys the two companies to feel big and powerful. Publicly, he talks about “synergy.”

Just the Math, Ma’am

The acquisitions happen. He makes no other changes.

Maximus just screwed Gaping Maw’s profit margin. The new profit margin is (all numbers in millions):

($9 milk + $2.5 ice cream + $80 legacy)/($300 milk + $50 ice cream + $1000 legacy) = 6.78%, down from 8%

Let that sink in: for purely mathematical reasons, having nothing to do with actual business operations or performance, consolidating two businesses under an umbrella business mathematically decreased the umbrella company’s profit margins.

BUT WAIT! What about synergy? That was Maximus’s publicly-stated reason for suggesting the acquisition.

The Synergy is Real

The Maximus synergy is for Ice Cream Co to buy all their milk from Milk Co instead of other suppliers. He proclaims this brilliant strategy in the annual report, to rescue the profit margin. He implements.

The new, synergy picture is this: $10 million of purchases that Ice Cream Co would have spent with other milk companies now goes to Milk Co, which will make its normal 3% profit on all those tasty new purchases. Everything else remains the same:

  • Milk Co makes $9.3 million profit on revenues of $310 million. That’s 3% profit.
  • Ice Cream Co still makes $2.5 million profit on $50 million. That’s still 5% profit.
  • Gaping Maw Co’s legacy businesses still make $80mm on $1Bn, for 8% profit.

Considered individually, each division is doing as well or better than before the merger.

Each division is doing just peachy. In fact, Milk Co is doing better in terms of absolute sales and absolute profit. That means that Gaping Maw has $10 million more in revenues, and $300K more in profit. Each division is as healthy as ever!! Healthier, even!!

Sounds like a win, right? Wrong.

But Synergy Makes Everything Worse

Because now Gaping Maw Co’s profit margin is (all numbers in millions):

($9.3 + $2.5 + $80) / ($310 + $50 + $1000) = 6.75%

Synergies were realized, and it made the profit margin even worse.

Yes, you read that correctly. The synergies were realized, and it pushed the profit margin lower[2]! From 6.78% to 6.75%.

As a conglomerate, the profit margin has gone down, even as the absolute dollar amount of profits has gone up.

Here’s How to Think About It

Here’s why: intuitively, business units with lower profitability than the overall company drag down the overall profitability margin. The more revenues come from low-profitability businesses, the more overall profitability sinks, even though the business is doing better.

It’s also possible to acquire a high-profitability business that boosts overall profitability while absolute revenue/profit numbers may decline. It’s the math; it’s not about how efficient or well-run the business is.

But all the market cares about is profit margin of the overall company. So your stock price will tank, the CEO will get fired, and Maximus will take his golden parachute (equivalent to the last ten years’ profits of all three companies combined) and retire.

BUSINESS MORAL: Know the math before you acquire or “synergize.” Know the absolute numbers and the margin numbers. Assume investors will only pay attention to overall profit margin, which means they might push you to do dumb things to maximize that number. Don’t listen. If you’re going to do dumb things, at least do your own dumb things.

PERSONAL MORAL for Maximus: If your sex life is unsatisfying, maybe you’re spending too much time at the office. Regardless, don’t take out your frustrations on innocent companies that are doing just fine.


  1. This article is emphatically not about CVS, even though it was inspired by reading that CVS is going to axe 2,900 jobs and possibly split up their insurance and pharmacy businesses to "improve financial performance. ↩︎

  2. The real problem here is that we demand steady or growing profits when viewed as a percentage return. It is beyond the scope of a simple essay to give this topic the treatment it deserves. ↩︎

No, I’m Not Crazy but I Hike Barefoot! with Greg Stern

Many jobs are new spent at screens. We’re sitting all day, and frankly, it’s not good for our bodies. Greg Stern, founder of Ground-Up Physio, will be joining me to explain why barefoot is better, slouching is super, and what we’ve been taught about how to use our bodies needs more than a little updating.

Reefer Madness: Saving the World with Christian Campbell

In the 1930s, the movie Reefer Madness was the centerpiece of a campaign to discredit marijuana. Almost a century later, actor/entrepreneur Christian Campbell turned it into a musical satire and commentary on manipulation and propaganda. In fact, the industrial uses of Hemp might be a significant piece of climate-friendly business. But how to spread that message when you can’t advertise the product?

Join us for a lively discussion about reefer, propaganda,  madness, musicals and saving the world.

Supercommunicators with Charles Duhigg

We all know people who seem to effortlessly connect with anyone they talk to. 

What’s their secret?


Pulitzer-Prize-winning journalist Charles Duhigg spent years researching this question and finding the answer. In his new book “Supercommunicators,” he explains that great communicators are always working on three levels: the practical (what this is really about), the emotional (how we feel), and the social (who we are).

Great communication begins by recognizing which conversation you’re in. In this livestream, Charles will share the simple yet profound lesson: with the right tools, you can connect with anyone, anywhere. Don’t miss this chance to gain the communication superpower!

Business Culture for Life Success with Alex Draper

Do organizations really prioritize the well-being of their employees and families? Of course not. At least, many don’t. But some do. And today we’re going to explore how they successfully live both their business and their cultural values. Our guest, Alex Draper from DX Learning, brings an insightful perspective from his work helping leaders live out company values. The lives of employees, and their entire families, are in the hands of business leaders. Alex will explore small habit shifts that profoundly impact an organization’s entire ecosystem.Alex will share his innovative CARE model, and together we’ll learn how leaders can walk their talk on a daily basis.

Top-Tier Culture: What it Is, Why It’s Good, and How to Create It with Michael Weening

What does the President & CEO of a billion-dollar company think of “grind culture”? Work-from-home? Productivity?

Michael Weening can tell us. The President and CEO of Calix, Inc. (NYSE: CALX), which just broke $1 billion in annualized revenue, Mr. Weening’s experience spans multiple geographies and cultures, including North America, Europe, and Asia. He has worked for companies who dominate their industries—Microsoft, Salesforce, and Bell Canada—and managed people in every business function from sales to marketing to operations. He knows what it takes to succeed in radically different cultures, with radically different personality types.

Calix was named “Most Inspiring Workplace in North America” and has been heralded as a top-tier “Best Place to Work” by GlassDoor, Fortune, and BestPlacesToWork.com. It has earned awards for Happiest Employees, Best Compensation, Best Work-Life Balance, and Best Perks & Benefits.